Why I became a Russian Catholic
In my early years of sojourning in the Roman Catholic Church, after I returned to Christ, at the age of 24, long ago, I noted marked differences between the ideals of that Church and their expressions in reality. While I cannot sufficiently enumerate those differences, two in particular come immediately to mind: The first is the radical differences between what was related in the Second Vatican Council and for two score years afterwards regarding liturgy, and the actual liturgical praxis in that Church for those last two score years; The second is the difference between the pivotal statement in the Vatican II Constitution on Divine Revelation, that the Holy Spirit has spoken to the Church through Scripture, Tradition, and the Teaching Authority of the Church, and the paucity of scripture, tradition and teaching authority to be found in the sermons or Divine Liturgies of most RC priests, the teachings of most RC bishops and cardinals, or the pronouncements of most RC ecclesial communities. I do not wish to cause dissention by this observation. I believe that I am simply stating the facts.
I found myself frustrated, and in fact angry, by this disparity. The anger, or frustration, was caused because I truly believed that this was the True Church, the center of Christ’s church, the Rock upon which even the gates of Hell would not prevail. And yet. . .
And yet I found no spiritual nourishment from it. After a futile year spent in the parish church of my youth, where (among many other things) the Monsignor there violated the express directive of Vatican II every liturgy by saying ‘The Lord is with you (instead of ‘The Lord be with you; turning a prayer into a prophesy, and from the extent of anger on my part which resulted from his disobedience, into a false prophesy), I chose to sing instead in a church which had a good choir, and which sang the range from Gregorian Chant to modern choral classics. It was good entertainment, and good singing, but I came to realize that what we were singing was just Sunday entertainment, not very far unlike Ralph Vaughan Williams’ starting a Sunday afternoon program of people singing and performing the choral masses of Franz Schubert at Oxford. In the main, the sermons there were of the pastor talking about his golf game. There was a crucial disjunct between prayer and performance.
Then one day, I happened to go into a bookstore, and find a cassette tape entitled ‘Russiche Kloster-Vesper”, on the label Koch-Schwann (which from my small stock of German I was able immediately to translate into “Russian Monastic Vespers”). I asked the store manager if he could play a few minutes of that tape. It was the most beautiful male a capella choral music I had ever heard. A couple of days later, I was able to raise the money necessary to buy that tape and take it home. I listened to it constantly, and began to translate the structure of the service in the liner notes from German into English. What I found could, with less difficulty, be found at this web address.
I began to realize that what was being sung was prayer, and the most beautiful prayer I had ever known. I was filled with it, and I asked God to send me to a place where I could pray like that. Within a month, I was led to St. Andrew Russian Catholic Church in El Segundo, California, in the very week that our pastor there, Fr. Alexei Smith, was being ordained for the service of the Divine Liturgy at St. Andrew’s.
I have been at St. Andrew’s ever since. There was a period of perhaps six months that I divided the time between St. Andrew’s and my old RC parish, St. Martin of Tours in Brentwood, but then came the Papal Masses of Los Angeles in 1987, and what happened there was the final straw in a long series of burdens which finally broke this camel’s back. I may recount it some day in this weblog, under the heading: “Why I am no longer a Roman Catholic”.
But I have found that it is more important to go to something that is good, rather than merely leave something because of the evils in it. I have gone to Russian Catholicism, and have remained in it for the past eighteen years, because in it, I have been nourished (through the services and the homilies of Fr. Alexei) in the saving truths and the true expressions of the Holy Spirit: Scripture, Tradition and the Councils. At the end of the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, in the priest’s prayer before the Ambo, are the words: “Bless those who love the beauty of Thy house; glorify them in turn by Thy power, and forsake us not who put our trust in Thee.” In St. Andrew Church, I am greatly blessed by its beauty, glorified by God’s power, and upheld by the Lord in whom I trust.
What sparked this essay was a link from Benjamin of Occidentalis, who in turn linked to Huw Raphael of Doxos, who in turn linked to a wonderful web site of what I believe are public domain MP3s of a wide range of music, from classic gospel and bluegrass, to Persian and middle eastern music, to Western classical and romantic music, to Gregorian Chant. In that last section, in addition to recordings of monastic latin chant from the 30’s to the 50’s, there is also the great treasure of that recording which led me to the church that has fed me for the last score of years, by the Benedictine monks of the Eastern Catholic monastery of Chevetogne. Here it is. (Warning: it is a large file, of about 39 MB or so)
Enjoy.
14 Comments:
"But I have found that it is more important to go to something that is good, rather than merely leave something because of the evils in it."
That is a very good point and one that I have had problems with in leaving the Episcopal Church. Currently I divide my time between a "Continuing Anglican" parish and a Maronite Catholic one. Both are wonderful. I love the Eastern Rite church for pretty much the reasons you give. Family reasons keep me tied to the Anglican tradition as well. Someday, I'll get to receive communion in the Catholic church, either here or at the _final_ and _completely_ Catholic church in the New Jerusalem. I look forward to it.
A compelling account of your search for authenticity. I understand where you are coming from.
1. As for the Russian Catholic Church, that is an enigma to me. Clearly this is not Ukrainian rite, or Byzantine-Hungarian rite.
2. A Western Catholic seeking beautiful liturgy in the Eastern Catholic churches will find it, but I've had a problem about the cultural divide. That Eastern churches are intent on preserving cultural identity is understandable, but unfortunately, this leaves Westerners feeling like blacksheep.
3. If there was something in the Catholic Church like the OCA (Orthodox Church of America), which is mostly English-speaking, but also very serious about liturgical piety. That would be an attractive alternative.
Cheers.
Dear Thirsty Scribe:
1. Russian Catholicism, like Russia herself, is a mystery wrapped up in an enigma wrapped up in a conundrum (or something like that), rather like matroshka dolls. The charitable say that the Russian Catholic movement started with the Russian philosopher Soloviev. The uncharitable (and perhaps more accurate) would say that it really got started by Jesuits who believed that the Mystery of Fatima was indicating that Russia should be converted to Catholicism through the Russian Catholic church. Regardless, the three or four Russian Catholic churches in the U.S. (Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, and Denver) appear to have a pleasant mix of weirdos and decent people, few of them ethnic.
2. Yeah, I've observed that churches with a major ethnic component to them (especially those with an influx of people from "The Old Country"-wherever that is-) tend to be more than a bit insular. "You not X (with X being the fill-in ethnicity): Why you here?". Fortunately, St. Andrew's is remarkably free of that. So, to the best of my knowledge, are the other Russian Catholic Churches here.
3. Funny you should mention the OCA. St. Andrew's makes full use of the OCA liturgical texts and music in its liturgy and other services. I'm given to understand that the same is the case for the remaining Russian Catholic churches. I've also found that the local OCA bishop (who is not in favor at all of such touchy-feely things like ecumenism), nonetheless has come out and written that as far at least as orthopraxy is concerned, St. Andrew's is more orthopraxic (that is, does the praxis of the Orthodox Churches) far better than many of the parishes under his omophorion.
If you by any chance are in the neighborhood, do feel free to come on over.
And my wife, Elizabeth, who is my Diotima, has this to say:
"I am here because St. Andrew's gives me great joy, because in it, I no longer feel alone, but I feel in union with my God. It has replaced the loneliness I once knew with a companionship to a greater whole than I ever thought or hoped I would know."
Bernard Brandt,
Thank you for a survey of this small but fascinating corner of the Church.
If there was a Russian Catholic parish in my area, sounds like I would fit right in.
"You are not X? Why you here?" That describes the reaction perfectly. The people who make up Eastern rite parishes in this country are not far removed from the "Old World." Apart from the older people who came directly from Eastern Europe, most are the children of immigrants.
The closest I've come to Russian Catholicism, was my time at Madonna House. It was founded by a 'baroness' from Russia, Catherine Doherty. I don't even think she saw herself as a 'Russian Catholic', as her family was originally Orthodox, while she became Roman while attending a convent school abroad. In any case, she tried to model the community on what she learned as a little girl in Russia. The community's chapel has an iconostasis, and they celebrate some Eastern feasts(www.madonnahouse.org)
Re: "I am here because St. Andrew's gives me great joy, because in it, I no longer feel alone, but I feel in union with my God. It has replaced the loneliness I once knew with a companionship to a greater whole than I ever thought or hoped I would know."
I think that is so beautiful. One day I hope to say the same words also. Isn't this what it means to be part of the Church? To be drawn out of one's own little world, into a new sort of existence, to know that you are on the Way with others.
Unfortunately, traditional Catholics spurn community as something "unimportant," while left-wing Catholics have no appreciation for liturgical worship. It's a crazy world.
Cheers
In Denver, we use OCA texts and music for Liturgy and a mishmash stuff for All-Night Vigil (St. Tikhon's Horologion, St. John of Kronstadt Press Menaion, Melkite Octoechos, The Holy Myrrhbearers Psalter, and some South African Greek Orthodox Church music).
Did Bishop TIKHON really say that St. Andrews had more Orthodox praxis than many OCA parishes in his diocese? Wow! It is because your deacon could kill someone with the censer as he walks by isn't it?
Dear Han Ng:
Glad to hear about the Denver church. From the various comments you have been leaving at Edward Yong's and the New Liturgical Movement's weblogs (among others), you appear to be a clear and cogent writer. Would you care to start a weblog and give us some of the perspective from your church? I for one would be fascinated.
Re His Grace's, the Bishop Tikhon's comment, it was in a message board which he frequents and that I happened to find when I was googling random things. I'm finding it difficult to re-find the statement, but when and if I do, I shall be happy to give it to you.
And actually, our deacon is pretty sedate in his use of the censer at the beginning of Divine Liturgy; it is our priest who is a wizard at the practice, outdoing Russian Orthodox and even most high-church Anglicans at the game.
Dear Mr. Brandt,
Thank you for the kind words. As far as your deacon goes, I saw him in action only at Holy Resurrection Monastery a couple years ago. Maybe these pilgrimages break down inhibitions and bring out those censer-swinging urges. :-)
As far as the blog goes, I do not think it would be a very good idea to start one. I haven't the time or the creativity to post daily, and I am sure it would only puff up my vanity.
The most interesting thing happening in Denver, however, is our All-night Vigil. Actually, it is more of a "One-watch Vigil" since we have abbreviated it down to about an hour and a half. Originally, we had intended on just celebrating Vespers, but Fr. Chrysostom really wanted to include all of the good Resurrectional stuff from Sunday Matins. My inner traditionalist revolted against using the New Skete order, so we took the received tradition All-night Vigil as started cutting.
Vespers is more or less intact. We cut the augmented litany and litany of supplication towards the end. Matins has been shortened quite a bit. We are leaving out all of the litanies except the litany of supplication at the end, we cut the Magnification, the Expostilarion and the proper prokeimenon before "God is the Lord and has revealed himself to us." Stragely, we kept a remnant of the monastic office by saying one psalm of the second and one of the third Kathismata. We include the sessional hymns between these psalter readings and the Polieleios. Also rather than sing all of the irmoi of the Canon, we actually do the Canon (or four of them), but only the first and ninth Odes. All in all, pretty exciting stuff. I think our redaction is quite good. It seems to be sustainable for parish use, includes a good balance of scripture and ecclesial poetry, and retains enough of the All-night Vigil as to be a development of, rather than a departure from the received tradition.
I am seeing signs of hope in the Western Rite, although the other day my brother had to endure a homily criticizing the hierarchy for "focusing too much on liturgical absuses, the Eucharist, and banning groups from meeting on Church property," and then the deacon stated that his spirituality is not mediated through any hierarchy.
I told my brother this deacon should be removed and letters should be written to the appropriate authorities. That deacon can join the Episcopal church; there is room for him there.
Thanks for offering the Eastern Catholic perspective on your blog. It is too neglected by many Western Rite Catholics. Ignorance about the Eastern Catholics abounds.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Dear Han Ng,
Thank you for your report as regards the Russian church in Denver. I am happy to see that your church is alive and well. Do please reconsider about weblogging.
Dear David,
Thank you for your comment as well. I have considerably more hope for the Roman Church now than I did eighteen years ago.
Regarding the deacon, I would suggest discipline and penance rather than simple removal. As a part of his penance, I would suggest that he be made to read The Celestial Hierarchy by Dionysius the Areopagite, a copy of which may be found here: http://www.esoteric.msu.edu/VolumeII/CelestialHierarchy.html
If he were to do so, he might find that a spirituality unmediated by any hierarchy is one focussed on something other than the Kingdom of Heaven.
what a great grace that you found St Andrew's. Most of us do not have that luxury. I remember attending St Michael's Russian Church in NYC many years ago and having the same feelings you describe.
I find it interesting that you liked St. Michael's in NYC as well as St. Andrew's in El Segundo. Both founder-priests of those churches come from the Jesuits at Fordham, and were very good friends.There is a story about these two wonderful priests, and the naming of their churches, which escapes me, but that adds much more to the interest of this post!
Byzantine-rite Catholicism, Eastern-rite Catholicism, call it what you like, was simply a ruse to bring Orthodox in communion with Rome. What the Crusades did not accomplish, this "Byzantine-rite Catholicsm" did, in effect sheep stealing in places like the Western Ukraine and the Levant, bringing Orthodox Christians under the wing of Rome.
Being liturgically Orthodox while still in Communion with Rome, ordaining married men while still in Communion with Rome, etc. Can't anybody see the obvious here?
Post a Comment
<< Home